External Assessment
Customers are using AI to find solutions, compare providers and decide who to consider. External Assessment tests whether your business appears in answers to relevant buyer questions, how your services are described and which alternatives are mentioned. Compare those findings with your website and, where supplied, your leadership priorities to decide what needs attention.
01
Compare the services your website presents, the capabilities AI associates with your business and whether your company appears in answers to buyer needs. Add supplied leadership priorities where available.
Follow a service across Leadership, Published, Understood and Buyer discovery. Select a service to trace its place in the example.
Supplied priorities
Website emphasis
AI’s company description
Answers to buyer needs
The four columns compare different kinds of evidence. Connections show service relationships; each column keeps its own ordering and coverage.
Solid lines: linked services in this example. Dashed lines: proposed interpretation. Real reports identify the evidence, review status and coverage for each finding. Leadership is included when priorities have been supplied.
Findings reflect the selected engines, questions and assessment date. A mention alone does not establish a recommendation or market position. Coverage and proposed matches help you judge the findings.
02
Use discovery gaps, differing service descriptions and named alternatives to focus the messaging, evidence or research you want to investigate.
Inspect the relevant questions, saved answers and source passages before deciding what to change.
03
Inspect the exact questions, saved AI answers and relevant source passages. Recorded engines, assessment dates and answer coverage help you judge what the findings support.
Enien uses an agreed scope and reviewed questions. Incomplete answers and interpretation status remain visible so you can take them into account.
04
Use External Assessment as a standalone engagement. When useful, PentaView can connect these external observations with executive, user, policy owner and expert perspectives.
05
We are developing separately scoped research into particular services and competitive positions. Scope, evidence and deliverables will be agreed separately.
In development
Explore which providers set a useful comparison, what they offer, the differentiators they claim and the evidence behind those claims.
A company-centred view of a service such as penetration testing: market segments, prominent providers, demand drivers, size estimates where credible sources exist, and your current position.
Bring the research back to your company: where to focus, which claims need stronger evidence and what to investigate before changing the proposition.
In development. Current buyer-discovery observations show who appears in the assessed answers. Broader market leadership, market size and explanations of commercial success require additional research.
Yes. Examine your website's published services, AI descriptions, buyer discovery and observed alternatives without completing an internal assessment.
The assessment records the providers appearing in answers to the agreed buyer questions and retains their service context. These observations help you inspect the alternatives returned for those needs. They do not establish market share or a universal provider ranking.
Yes, where leaders supply their service priorities. Compare those inputs with the website's emphasis, AI descriptions and buyer-discovery observations.
PentaView brings the external observations alongside executive, user, policy owner and expert perspectives when you want to examine the relationship between internal alignment and your external message.
Inspect the exact questions, saved AI answers and relevant source passages, with recorded engine details, assessment dates and answer coverage. Agree any additional research, data access or exports separately.
We are developing follow-up research into provider propositions, publicly supported differentiators and company-centred service questions. Each engagement will have a separately agreed scope and deliverables, with claims and estimates clearly identified.
Enien uses a defined scope, reviewed questions and retained responses and evidence. The report shows coverage and interpretation status so you can inspect and challenge the findings. Check important AI statements against the available evidence.
The assessment records what the selected engines return for the agreed questions. It helps you identify gaps and decide what to investigate or change. Any later assessment provides a new dated observation; an improvement in AI visibility is not guaranteed.
Agree the supported engines to include before answer collection. The report records engine details, available model information and the assessment date. Results may differ between engines and runs.
Tell us the problem, the people involved and where you would like to start.
Already a customer? Sign in to your workspace.